Many lawyers are reacting to the directive by the
Attorney General of the Federation’s decision ordering the Chief Judge of
Bayelsa State to perform the oath on the incoming governor, Nyesom Wike on May
29.
A prominent Lagos based lawyer, Festus Keyamo said
the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Muhammed Adoki was right on the
directive for Wike to be sworn in by the Chief Judge of Bayelsa State.
He backed his argument with the last part of Section
1852 of the 1999 Constitution. He also said that it was inconceivable that the assumption
of office of a public officer who has been declared winner in an election could
be scuttled because of absence of someone who should perform the ceremonial
duties.
Meanwhile, a human right activist, Charles Jaja, has
described as unconstitutional the directive by the attorney general of the
federation directive that the chief judge of Bayelsa State should administer oath
of office on Wike.
Jaja said a right does not belong to the AGF.
He said: “the truth is that even though the Attorney
General of the Federation has looked for a way to assist Rivers State, but I think
this is beyond assisting Rivers State. These are constitutional matters and I don’t
see AGF having such power because there is nowhere in the constitution where
powers are being donated to him to issue such a directive. Mr Adoki being an
agent of the FG cannot act as a chapel on this particular matter.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
I would love to know what you think about this post. Please leave a comment here-